The chess world was shaken by the outcome of the 2024 FIDE World Chess Championship in Singapore, where Indian Grandmaster D. Gukesh dethroned the reigning champion, Ding Liren. This historic victory not only made Gukesh the youngest World Chess Champion at the age of 18 but also brought controversy and intense scrutiny to the fore. Following his defeat, Ding faced accusations from Russian Chess Federation chief Andrei Filatov of deliberately losing the match, prompting a call for an investigation by FIDE.
Amid these allegations, Ding Liren has publicly defended himself, emphasizing his commitment and effort throughout the championship. In an interview with ChessBase India, Ding addressed the criticism, saying, “Yes, I tried my best in the match and you could see my usage of time. I used a large amount of time in the opening phase when I was not familiar with the position. I tried to figure out what is going on… And sometimes I did a good job and sometimes I didn’t find a clear way to develop.” Ding also praised Gukesh’s gameplay, asserting that both players displayed moments of high-quality chess.
Despite the controversy, the championship highlighted numerous themes and takeaways that are reshaping the global chess landscape.
Gukesh’s Historic Achievement
Gukesh’s victory solidifies his place in chess history as the 18th World Chess Champion. At just 18 years old, he surpassed the age records of legends like Garry Kasparov and Magnus Carlsen when they first won the title. Gukesh’s journey from a seven-year-old spectator of the 2013 Carlsen-Anand World Championship to achieving his lifelong dream underscores the power of perseverance and ambition.
“When Magnus won, I thought I really want to be the one to bring back the title to India,” Gukesh shared. His victory marks the beginning of a new era for Indian chess, inspiring countless young players worldwide.
A Match to Remember
The 14-game series in Singapore was anything but predictable. Ding started strong with a win in Game 1, setting the tone for a fiercely competitive championship. As the games progressed, both players demonstrated resilience and creativity, with the scoreline featuring critical wins and tightly contested draws. The climax came in Game 14, where a critical error by Ding handed Gukesh the title in dramatic fashion.
While some, including former champions Magnus Carlsen and Vladimir Kramnik, questioned the overall quality of play, fans and analysts applauded the match for its tension and unpredictability. Gukesh’s ability to dodge tiebreaks and maintain composure under immense pressure became defining traits of his success.
The Mental Battle
Gukesh credited much of his success to his mental preparation, working with renowned sports psychologist Paddy Upton. This focus on mental resilience was evident throughout the match, especially after his tough loss in Game 1. Gukesh’s ability to recover and fight back showcased his championship mindset.
In contrast, Ding’s journey was marked by moments of brilliance but also lapses in self-belief. His decision-making in critical moments, such as the infamous blunder in Game 14, reflected the challenges he faced under pressure. Despite this, Ding’s fighting spirit and sportsmanship earned widespread admiration, even from Gukesh himself, who called him “a real inspiration.”
A Turning Point for Chess
The 2024 World Chess Championship signifies more than just a change in titleholders. It represents a generational shift in chess, with Gukesh symbolizing the rise of young, dynamic talent. His victory is also a testament to the strength of Indian chess, following in the footsteps of Viswanathan Anand, India’s first World Chess Champion.
As Gukesh embarks on his reign, the chess world eagerly anticipates his future battles, including potential clashes with Magnus Carlsen and other top contenders. Meanwhile, Ding Liren has expressed his desire to continue competing, emphasizing his love for the game and determination to bounce back.
Conclusion
The 2024 FIDE World Chess Championship will be remembered as a milestone in chess history—not only for Gukesh’s historic victory but also for the resilience and passion displayed by both players. As the chess world moves forward, the legacy of this championship will inspire players and fans alike, reminding us of the beauty and drama inherent in the game.
Link to the original article on Chess.com
Our Summer Chess Camps are the best!
We have daily Online Group Lessons for all players of all skill levels!
Our Monthly Chess Tournaments are great for testing your skills!
Get a School Chess Program today!
Join the official Summit School of Chess Club (on Chess.com)
I was hoping to hear what was the basis of the claim that Ding threw the match, or why he would do that. Especially I would like to know what incentive the Russian Chess Federation has for creating this controversy.
During the championship that Ding won, it became clear that he’s been bred his whole life for chess at personal expense he was not at peace with. If so, that kind of blunder could even have an unconscious element to it. He’s a beautiful man.
Aleksandar Colovik, Fair Play Officer found job easier due to D Gukesh, Ding Liren’s impeccable behavior.
In the high-pressure crucible of the World Chess Championship, it wasn’t just the brilliance of D Gukesh’s moves that left an indelible mark – it was his unwavering poise under tense situations that etched an unforgettable impression.
If Ding was deliberately trying to throw the much he would’ve done so in a less obvious way. That final game was heading for a draw and Ding wouldn’t have lost with an obvious blunder.
If it was his plan to lose he would’ve played dynamic attacking (by highly risky chess) then if he lost all the fans would say “at least played attacking chess and was trying to win”.
But he didn’t play that way. He took every opportunity in every game to draw. The whole tournament he was playing “not to lose”. So for the Russian chess federation to claim that he “purposefully lost” is bullshit.
From the remarks made by Magnus and others, it looks like they were not able to digest the rise of Asian chess once again. There is subtle racism at play when they downplay the quality of this WC. It may have been a major blunder by Ding, but all matches are won only because one players blunders. So let’s not make much of the quality of play. It was a superb show by both and the best man won. Period.